Archive for » 2011 «

Journey into Google’s brain

Google is never afraid of taking on risks, and one such risk was to allow a journalist to spend hundreds of hours with it employees, look over engineers’ shoulders as they developed products, and sit in on internal confabs, acknowledges Steven Levy in In the Plex: How Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives.

The prologue begins with the question, ‘Have you heard of Google?’ posed to villagers in Ragihalli, thirty miles outside Bangalore. “Twenty-two people from a company based in Mountain View, California, had driven in SUVs and vans up an unpaved road to this enclave of seventy threadbare huts with cement floors, surrounded by fields occasionally trampled by unwelcome elephants,” narrates Levy, as an observer on the annual trip of Google associate product managers (APMs), a select group pegged as the company’s future leaders. The trip in 2007 had begun in San Francisco and touched down in Tokyo, Beijing, Bangalore, and Tel Aviv before returning home 16 days later, he informs.

The APMs on the trip worked all over Google, one learns. “In search, advertising, applications, and even stealth projects such as Google’s attempt to capture the rights to include magazines in its index… Every activity had an underlying purpose to increase the participants’ understanding of a technology or business issue, or make them more (in the parlance of the company) ‘Googley.”

An example mentioned in the book is of an activity in Tokyo, when teams of participants engaged in a scavenger hunt in the city’s legendary Akihabara electronics district, to buy with $50 the weirdest gadgets they could find – like USB-powered ashtrays shaped like football helmets that suck up smoke, a plate-sized disk that simulated the phases of the moon, a breathalyser you could install in your car, and a stubby wand that when waved back and forth spelled out words in LED lights. “Another Tokyo high point was the 5 a.m. trip to the Tsukiji fish market. It wasn’t the fresh sushi that fascinated the APMs but the mechanics of the fish auction, in some ways similar to the way Google works its AdWords program.”

Andy’s Android

In a chapter titled ‘Outside the box’ you would meet Andy Rubin, ‘a maniacal robot aficionado – he would haunt the Akihabara district of Tokyo for weird Japanese toys, and build a few of his own.’ Rubin had co-founded Danger to make a mobile communication device called the Sidekick, less a cell phone than a tiny computer, arguably the first smart phone with a measurable IQ, the author traces. “Instant messaging, not phone calls, was the Sidekick’s main purpose; you held it sideways, slid out a keyboard, and began thumb-punching IMs, which appeared in colourful pop-ups on a bright screen. It became popular with teenagers and rap musicians.”

While Sidekick’s built-in search engine was Google, what would bring Rubin closer to the search giant was to be Android, the company he founded for creating an operating system that would power whole families of smart phones. Rubin’s idea was to give the system to the big network carriers like Verizon or Sprint for free, the book recounts.

“This would save the carriers money, since they wouldn’t have to licence an operating system from a company like Microsoft or build their own. (Typically a carrier pays 20 per cent of the per-phone cost for an operating system.)… Rubin’s plan was to make money by selling back-end services to go with the operating system, such as storage, support, and security.”

Google’s bet

A turning point in the story was the idea of Larry Page to buy Android, to get deeper into the mobile. It was 2005, and Google’s mission was to access and organise the world’s information, the author notes. He explains that, interpreted broadly as Page did, it meant that what was good for the Web or for the cloud was good for Google, and what was good for the growing universe of wireless communication over mobile phone carrier networks would also be good for Google. “Because the carriers tightly controlled the software that ran on phones using their networks, Google had reason to worry that it might not have the opportunity to place its services on those nets. An open network would give Google unlimited opportunity, so that even if Google spent millions of dollars to develop an operating system – and then gave it away for free – it would still come out ahead.”

The book cites an interesting snatch of conversation between Rubin and his boss Alan Eustace, Google’s director of engineering, on the process Google used to improve itself. Did Rubin hear Eustace talk about quality assurance teams and focus groups? No, Eustace instead likened Google’s brain to a baby’s, an omnivorous sponge that was always getting smarter from the information it soaked up. He said, for instance, that when a Google user searched for Nike shoes, there were sets of algorithms that determined search results and another set that figured out which ad should appear alongside the results, then another set of algorithms would run an instant auction. “But the system was always learning. Rubin liked hearing that; his own companies had evolved from protean ideas. Danger had originally been centred on digital cameras before becoming a cell phone company…”

Dream, dream

The person to manage the Android product in Google was to be Erick Tseng, a CS master’s from MIT who had spent a few years as a McKinsey Company consultant before going back to school to get an MBA from Stanford. And, over a lunch with Google CEO Eric Schmidt who lectured at the school, Tseng would change his mind from taking a job as a venture capitalist with Sequoia.

What Schmidt told Tseng was to imagine a world where a company like Google can provide cell phones to everyone in the world for free. “Now imagine the possibility of what that can enable. It’s not just about the phones. Whether you’re in the US or you’re in Africa, you will be connected to your family, your friends – and to all the content on the Web. That is something Google is possibly working on.” Importantly, the APMs who visited Ragihalli found the villagers to be using mobile phones though unaware of Google.

At first the Android team worked on two different systems, the author writes. One was called the Sooner, based on the existing Android prototype, with a keypad sitting underneath the screen, and designed to get into the market quickly, he adds. “For the long term, Rubin’s group wanted to develop a more advanced platform with a touch screen. He dubbed that version the Dream.”

But, when Apple’s new iPhone redefined the smart phone in January 2007 – and delivered the future ahead of schedule by offering touch screen, tightly integrated software, and sharp display – ‘Sooner’ became never, and Android went straight ahead to the Dream, Levy recalls.

Apparently, it took a while for Steve Jobs to understand that Google was becoming his competitor, as the author underlines.

A tale that can keep you enthralled, even as the New Year rings in.

Tailpiece

“After all the debate what we got was…”

“The lokpal?”

“No, a blockpal!”

BookPeek.blogspot.com


Wine shop closes, moves to online-only sales

Wine shop closes, moves to online-only sales

By Alex Bridges — abridges@nvdaily.com

WINCHESTER — The city’s downtown said adieu this week to Saluté! Wine Market as the business shifts to Internet-only sales.

Saluté! owner David Dobersztyn spent Thursday selling the remaining bottles of wine, clearing furniture from his store at 111 N. Loudoun St. and saying goodbye to longtime customers.

“We’re focusing on online sales mainly because we’ve seen more growth in that area and a larger opportunity to serve a national market,” Dobersztyn said.
“I think we’re responding to a consumer-driven shopping preference,” he added. “I think you see that with a lot of national chains as well. Many more consumers are shopping online, for everything from wine to socks.”

Saluté! opened on the Loudoun Street Pedestrian Mall in September 2005. The business began selling products for the past five to six years online at salutewinemarket.com, according Dobersztyn, who lives in Winchester.

Longtime patron Earl Sutherland, from Frederick County, said he could keep buying wine from Saluté! online.

“It’s not the same,” he said.

Saluté! also focused on educating novice and experienced consumers through weekend tastings and classes. Those popular offerings also end with the store’s closing.

“But a lot of product that we sell is sold on reputation, scores and reviews and reputation of the wineries, so consumers are already familiar with the product,” Dobersztyn said.

The decision to switch didn’t come overnight. Dobersztyn said he started planning at the beginning of the year to change the business model and eventually close the storefront.

He said the market has seen a shift away from the “lower end” of the price range of the store’s products. Saluté! sells “premium” and “ultra premium” wines more on a national level, although the store does have some local customers shopping in that higher price range, Dobersztyn said.

“But we have not seen a large enough market in that area,” he said.

The dip in the economy in recent years and the pending construction work slated for the downtown mall in early 2013 influenced his decision to close.

“We think that 2012 will be slightly better than this year … but not significantly,”
Dobersztyn said. “Couple that with the first half of 2013 being probably flat because of that construction work, we see 18 months [from now] before downtown is really vibrant again.”

Dobersztyn said he supports the efforts to improve the downtown mall, but worries about businesses making it through the months-long construction process.

Consumers turn to do-not-track software to maintain privacy

The consultant from Northville, Mich., subsequently learned Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Adobe and many other companies also exhaustively track his online activities. “I was very unnerved to discover the extent of all the other tracking that was done by nearly every site on the Web,” he says.

So Kress, 61, did some homework about a powerful class of online tools and services — most of them free — designed to block online behavioral tracking. He began using a new free service called Do Not Track Plus from Internet privacy start-up Abine.

Kress is part of a grass-roots movement that began to swell late in the year and is expected to continue growing in 2012: consumers taking online privacy into their own hands.

Suppliers of the best-known anti-tracking tools — Ghostery, Adblock Plus and TrackerBlock — all reported big jumps in usage in the second half of 2011. Ghostery, for instance, is being downloaded by 140,000 new users each month, with total downloads doubling to 4.5 million in the past 12 months, says Scott Meyer, CEO of parent company Evidon.

Adblock Plus has been downloaded more than 140 million times and is currently in daily use by more than 17 million Internet users worldwide, managing director Till Faida says. TrackerBlock usage continues to steadily rise, with total daily users numbering in the hundreds of thousands, says Jim Brock, founder of parent company PrivacyChoice.

Meanwhile, the goal of newcomer Abine, supplier of Do Not Track Plus, is to make anti-tracking as common as anti-virus for personal computing devices, says CEO Bill Kerrigan, who formerly headed anti-virus giant McAfee’s global consumer business.

Abine projects the number of Internet users in North America using anti-tracking tools and services will be 28.1 million by the end of 2012, up from 17.2 million today. “We want to drive the next level of adoption,” Kerrigan says. “No one is suggesting don’t use Facebook or Google. At the same time, we are suggesting there is a better way for consumers to experience those type of products without necessarily being tracked at every step they take in their digital life.”

Privacy hot potato

Online tracking has been a privacy hot potato for more than a decade. The relentless collection, correlation and selling of tracking data take place to help advertisers deliver more relevant ads to individual Web users.

Online tracking undergirds the burgeoning online display ad market, which is expected to swell 36% to $34.4 billion by the end of 2012, up from $25.3 billion in 2011, according to online marketing firm Zenith Optimedia.

Yet, despite this growing mountain of tracking data and the free flow of advertising dollars, the delivery of behaviorally targeted ads continues to be clunky, at best, says Aleecia McDonald, a resident fellow at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society. “Ad practices like retargeting, where you click on a pair of shoes once, and ads for the shoes follow you around the Web, make people wonder how that could have happened,” McDonald says.

Meanwhile, social networks and Web app developers are getting into the tracking game, exploring novel ways to derive fresh revenue from tracking data.

Facebook says it currently uses tracking data strictly to boost security and improve members’ online experience. But it also has sought patent protection for technology that includes a method to correlate tracking data with advertisements.

These developments have heightened concerns about the co-mingling of sensitive information that consumers often naively disclose at many websites they visit. The Federal Trade Commission and several lawmakers took major steps in 2011 toward curbing how far companies can go to collect and share tracking data.

The FTC called for a Do Not Track mechanism that would enable Internet users to request not to be tracked. And Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., proposed a Do Not Track bill that would compel companies to heed such requests.

But tracking and online advertising companies lobbied intensively to maintain industry self-policing as the status quo. They’ve argued that unregulated tracking is necessary to help pay for free Web content and services that consumers have come to expect.

“Basic tracking of a user’s displayed behavior is an effective way for publishers to earn more revenue for their ad space and for advertisers to see greater returns on their marketing spends,” says Will Riegel, a New York City-based tracking data analyst.

As this debate extends into the new year, consumer backlash appears to be gaining grass-roots momentum. More and more average Web users, such as Doug Toombs, 25, a quality assurance engineer from Cambridge, Ontario, are discovering and using available anti-tracking technologies while the global privacy debate continues.

Toombs recently started using Do Not Track Plus and marveled at how the tool automatically blocked more than 13,000 attempts to track his online activities in the course of a few weeks. “Being able to counteract it (tracking) absolutely made me feel much better,” Toombs says. “People need to fight back and not get bullied around by these big companies that think they can do anything they want.”

Flaws and improvements

Anti-tracking technologies have been around for several years, but most tools and services — including the anti-tracking features built directly into Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, Mozilla’s Firefox, Google’s Chrome and Apple’s Safari Web browsers — have earned a reputation for being complicated and confusing.

A study titled “Why Johnny Can’t Opt Out,” published last month by Carnegie Mellon University’s CyLab, found serious usability flaws in nine top anti-tracking systems.

“Our research found that these tools are difficult for consumers to use properly,” says CyLab professor Lorrie Faith Cranor, who conducted the research.

One complexity, for instance, is that anti-tracking tools must be configured to work with specific browsers. Another is that if you try to use multiple tools, things can go haywire.

Even so, more consumers appear to be looking for direct ways to control tracking, Stanford’s McDonald says.

“A sizable proportion of Internet users want to protect their privacy,” she says. “Better tools and more knowledge would do nothing if there were no demand for privacy.”

In response, anti-tracking software makers are hustling to deliver more accessible and flexible systems.

The latest version of Ghostery, for instance, is very quick and simple to download. And what the consumer gets is a blocking mechanism that is much more effective than simply issuing Do Not Track requests and hoping companies obey, as the FTC has called for, Evidon’s Meyer says.

Ghostery automatically blocks all tracking mechanisms issued by several hundred companies on an extensive list that includes two of the most expansive tracking networks: Google’s DoubleClick and Microsoft’s Media Network.

It also stops Facebook from amassing data about every Web page you visit that has a Facebook Like button or the Facebook Connect log-on service.

Ghostery’s blacklist is continually updated with help from a panel of some 300,000 of its users who voluntarily permit Evidon to continually analyze fresh attempts at tracking. “People love being part of the Ghostery community,” says Meyer. “It’s a very powerful group of sophisticated Web users who like having direct feedback into the product.”

TrackerBlock and Do Not Track Plus also rely on continually updated lists to block tracking mechanisms issued by ad networks and social networks, as does Adblock Plus, the most widely downloaded tool.

Adblock Plus is best-known for its ability to block online advertisements from being visually displayed on Web pages. But it can also be configured to block tracking mechanisms, and more users are setting it up that way, Faida says. “Our tool provides easy control over who is allowed to track you,” Faida says. “We are aware that some people have trouble using Adblock Plus as a tracking blocker, and therefore are going to make it much easier to use Adblock Plus as a privacy and security tool.”

In control of your privacy

Meanwhile, average consumers who’ve already figured out how to use the current anti-tracking tools say the trouble is well worth it.

William Morris, 55, a custom car restorer and home remodeler from Elk City, Okla., discovered that the performance of his older Windows XP desktop PC improved considerably once he curtailed the tracking communications constantly taking place in the background on his browser.

One evening, Morris spent two and a half hours researching a physics topic online, keeping an eye on the tally of tracking attempts blocked by Do Not Track Plus. The total: 4,076. “It’s unbelievable that there are that many entities out there on the Internet poking their nose into whatever I’m doing,” Morris says.

Kress, the consultant from Michigan, says the main benefit he reaps “is knowing that my browsing and Internet activities are much more private and are not being pirated by a collection of miscreants intent upon benefiting themselves, at my expense, without my knowledge or permission.”

Many users of TrackerBlock feel the same way. In a recent PrivacyChoice survey of 668 TrackerBlock users, 87% of the respondents said the reason they use an anti-tracking tool is because they do not want anyone collecting data about what they do online.

Consumers generally feel more comfortable being in control of who gets to analyze their browsing habits, PrivacyChoice founder Brock says.

“That feeling of control is something that the industry needs to deliver in order for behavioral targeting to be a sustainable marketing method,” Brock says. “The more you honor consumer preferences, the more consumers will be willing to accept tracking technologies.”

Town expected to sell surplus for $75000, instead earns $160000 using municibid

MANSFIELD, Mass., Dec 29, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) –
The Town of Mansfield, Mass. expected to sell 75 surplus items for
somewhere around $75,000 … instead, they earned $160,000 using municibid,
an online
government auctions platform used by over 50 cities and towns in
Massachusetts and 600 government agencies nationwide.

Items sold included heavy equipment, vehicles, snow plows, a
screening plant, bicycles, tools, electric vehicles and more. A
complete list of items and sale prices can be found here:

http://municibid.com/search.asp?searchtxt=mansfieldsearchtype=2show=closedsortpref=ends_desc

“Needless to say we are thrilled with the results,” said Mike
Ahern, Special Projects Manager with the Town of Mansfield. Ahern
added, “But with the exposure and truly competitive bidding through
municibid, I have to say it wasn’t that much of surprise that we did so
well.” “The best part is we get to keep 100% of the
proceeds,” said Ahern.

The Pottstown, Pennsylvania based municibid.com is different from other government
auctions websites because it’s a free service for government that
proactively lists items all over the social web and industry sites to
target bidders of specific items. It integrates into the social media
world via facebook, twitter, YouTube, Linkedin and more.

Government merchandise is now a click away from a huge online audience,
resulting in more bids and more money. The selling process is fast and
the service is easy to use.

About municibid.com

municibid.com is an online government auction platform designed for
government agencies at all levels to more effectively sell surplus,
forfeitures and other no longer needed items. municibid.com gives the
general public a more convenient and much less intimidating platform to
bid on government surplus. If you’re with a government agency and would
like more information on using municibid.com, please contact Greg Berry
at greg.berry@municibid.com
or 800.531.6074 x703. Bidders can register, for free, at
www.municibid.com .

SOURCE: municibid.com


        municibid.com
        Greg Berry, Founder  CEO
        800-531-6074 x703
        greg.berry@municibid.com
        or
        Town of Mansfield
        Mike Ahern, Special Projects Manager
        508-922-8387
        mahern@mansfieldma.com 

www.municibid.org            

Copyright Business Wire 2011

Comtex

The 10 top ads of 2011

Chalk up another reason to be thankful for moms. Even as the advertising industry races madly off in all directions with frenzied bids to get their clients’ messages in front of consumers – through Facebook apps, QR codes on wine bottles and billboards and banana peels, sponsored tweets, etc. – ad agency creative directors know they’ll still have trouble explaining to their moms exactly what it is they do.

But a great commercial? Ah. That requires no explanation. And so, even if TV advertising seems to be on the wane, the form is reaching ever higher, with mini-epics that tug at the heart, give voice to the voiceless, make us laugh, snag a moment in the cultural dialogue – and, yes, occasionally even sell something.

The best ads of 2011 reflect the ups and downs of our economy: after their brushes with death a few years ago, auto makers have found a bit of swagger – and so have their ads; Google makes us feel warm and fuzzy about its takeover of the planet; and Canadian ad agencies, who don’t usually have a free hand to spend as generously as their U.S. counterparts, found a way to grab attention this year by using some high tech that didn’t bust the bank.

These are, of course, subjective choices. So if you disagree, feel free to let us know. But please, leave your mom out of it.

US finalizes deal to sell F-15s to Saudi Arabia

Originally published: December 29, 2011 11:54 AM
Updated: December 29, 2011 3:01 PM

By The Associated Press
 JULIE PACE (Associated Press)

Quick ReadUS finalizes deal to sell F-15s to Saudi Arabia; part of effort to contain threats from Iran

(AP) — The sale of $30 billion worth of F-15SA fighter jets to Saudi Arabia has been finalized, boosting the military strength of a key U.S. ally in the Middle East to help counter Iran, the Obama administration announced Thursday.

Under the agreement, the U.S. will send Saudi Arabia 84 new fighter jets and upgrades for 70 more. Production of the aircrafts, which will be manufactured by Boeing…

Newsday ExploreLI are now available at no charge to Newsday 7-day and Optimum Online® subscribers. To continue reading, please log in or register now.

Bank Shuts Down Local Online Advertising Company WebVisible For Not Paying Debts

WebVisible

Local interactive advertising firm WebVisible has shut its doors. According to a note sent from the company’s CEO to employees, WebVisible ran out of cash, and Silicon Valley Bank is shutting the company down.

WebVisible’s software allowed advertisers to manage local online campaigns on Google, Yahoo, Bing and others. The company’s services were offered directly affiliate partners to local businesses, franchisors, and national advertisers Previous WebVisible partners include ATT, British Telecom, Yellow Pages Group of Canada, EarthLink, and The McClatchy Company, among others.

WebVisible, which was founded in 2001, has raised over $17 million from Sutter Hill Ventures, Redpoint Ventures, and Adams Street partners.

Here’s part of the note sent to employees:

It is with deep sadness and regret that I must inform you that today, December 27, 2011 is the last day of operation for WebVisible. I know this is a shock and has come abruptly. Even with all our efforts to recover throughout this past year, we found ourselves in a position in which the debt load of the company was simply too much to overcome. Our bank foreclosed on its loan which means they are taking over the company’s assets and collecting all remaining payments. As a result they have forced the company to shut down….This happened quite suddenly, and the timing could not be more unfortunate…As of today there are no employees left at WebVisible, including myself and therefore there is no one to handle anything for you.. This is like a bad movie, I can’t imagine a worse scenario for shutting a company down and laying everyone off, the only concession I was able to get from the bank was to wait until after Christmas. As the CEO I apologize that I have not been able to do more to avoid this event and this timing.

We are still trying to get confirmation from the company, and will update when we hear back.


  • WEBVISIBLE

Based in Southern California, WebVisible is a Software as a Service (SaaS) company and leading name in local online advertising, known for being a true expert in bringing the Internet as an advertising and customer acquisition medium to small businesses around the world.

Through direct sales and global partners in the Yellow Pages, newspaper, and online marketing industries, we offer our innovative online advertising products to small business customers.

Our advertising products are powered by our award winning Geneva software platform…

Learn more